green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.9 score
“because dengel did not plead that he and his wife signed the credit agreement ... as required by la. r.s. 6:1122, dengel may not maintain an action for the alleged breach.”
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
L.A. Homes, Inc. v. First National Bank USA
because dengel did not plead that he and his wife signed the credit agreement ... as required by la. r.s. 6:1122, dengel may not maintain an action for the alleged breach.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Padilla
See generally, Nesbit v. Gears Unlimited, Inc., 347 F.3d 72 , 76 -77 (3d Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 959 , 124 S.Ct. 1714 , 158 L.Ed.2d 400 (2004) (federal courts have an independent obligation to satisfy themselves that they have subject matter jurisdiction and may raise the issue sua sponte); Packard v. Provident National Bank, 994 F.2d 1039, 1049 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 964 , 114 S.Ct. 440 , 126 L.Ed.2d 373 (1993) (federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, and as such are under a continuing duty to satisfy themselves of their jurisdiction before proceeding to the me…
discussed
Cited "see"
Christaldi-Smith v. JDJ, INC.
See Nesbit v. Gears Unlimited, Inc., 347 F.3d 72, 84 (3d Cir.2003) (holding that a district court should have decided whether a defendant employed more than fifteen people under the summary judgment standard rather than as a motion for judgment on the pleadings), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 959 , 124 S.Ct. 1714 , 158 L.Ed.2d 400 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Burge v. Pearl River County, Mississippi
See Bolen v. Dengel, 340 F.3d 300, 312 (5th Cir.2003), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 1714 , 158 L.Ed.2d 399 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Burge v. Pearl River County
See Bolen v. Dengel, 340 F.3d 300, 312 (5th Cir. 2003), cert. denied, 124 S. Ct. 1714 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Thorpe
See, e.g., Nesbit v. Gears Unlimited, Inc., 347 F.3d 72, 76-77 (3d Cir. 2003), cert, denied, 541 U.S. 959 , 124 S.Ct. 1714 , 158 L.Ed.2d 400 (2004); In re Mullarkey, 536 F.3d 215, 220 (3d Cir. 2008); In re Olick, 2010 WL 4509828 , at *1 n. 5 (Bankr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DeRosa v. ACCREDITED HOME LENDERS
See, e.g., Nesbit v. Gears Unltd., Inc., 347 F. 3d 72, 84-85 (3d Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 959 , 124 S.Ct. 1714 , 158 L.Ed. 2d 400 (2004); Pearson, supra, 247 F. 3d at 485-86 ; Hukill v. Auto Care, Inc., 192 F. 3d 437, 442 (4th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1116 , 120 S.Ct. 1978 , 146 L.Ed. 2d 806 (2000); Lusk v. Foxmeyer Health Corp., 129 F. 3d 773, 777 (5th Cir.1997); Esmark, supra, 887 F. 2d at 753 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sabertooth, LLC v. Simons (In Re Sabertooth, LLC)
See, e.g., Nesbit v. Gears Unlimited, Inc., 347 F.3d 72, 76-77 (3d Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 959 , 124 S.Ct. 1714 , 158 L.Ed.2d 400 (2004) (a federal court has the independent duty to consider its subject matter jurisdiction and to consider sua sponte, if necessary, whether subject matter jurisdiction exists); Packard v. Provident Nat’l Bank, 994 F.2d 1039 , 1049 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 964 , 114 S.Ct. 440 , 126 L.Ed.2d 373 (1993) (“[i]t is axiomatic that federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, and as such are under a continuing duty to satisfy themselves of th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Otu v. Papa John's USA, Inc.
“When the workplace is permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult that is sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of the victim’s employment and create an abusive working environment, Title VII is violated.” Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., Inc., 523 U.S. 75, 77 , 118 S.Ct. 998 , 140 L.Ed.2d 201 (1998)(quoting Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 21 , 114 S.Ct. 367 , 126 L.Ed.2d 295 (1993)). “[W]hen analyzing whether an employer should be held liable for a supervisor’s harassment, courts should separate these cases into two groups: (1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Krasner v. Episcopal Diocese of Long Island
Although there appears to be a split in the circuits as to whether this issue is a jurisdictional question or a merit inquiry, the Second Circuit has determined that it is not jurisdictional, but a “ground for defeating [the] claim on the merits.” Da Silva v. Kinsho Int’l Corp., 229 F.3d 358, 365 (2d Cir.2000) accord Fernandez v. M & L Milevoi Mgmt., 357 F.Supp.2d 644, 647 (E.D.N.Y.2005); see also Nesbit v. Gears Unlimited, Inc., 347 F.3d 72 (3d Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 959 , 124 S.Ct. 1714 , 158 L.Ed.2d 400 (2004); Johnson v. Apna Ghar, Inc., 330 F.3d 999 (7th Cir.2003); EEOC v…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carl A. DENGEL
v.
R. Michael BOLEN, United States Trustee, Region 5
v.
R. Michael BOLEN, United States Trustee, Region 5
No. 03-1057.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 29, 2004.
Published
Citer courts: Louisiana Court of Appeal (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.