green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
James v. Uber Technologies Inc.
A defendant may thus raise an affirmative defense for the first time later in the 7 litigation, but “only if the delay does not prejudice the plaintiff.” Id. (quoting Magana, 107 F.3d 8 at 1446).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: Advanced Beauty Solutions, LLC
See, e.g., City of S. Pasadena v. Mineta, 7 284 F.3d 1154 , 1157 (9th Cir. 2002); Trulis v. Barton, 107 F.3d 8 685, 691 (9th Cir. 1995). 9 In this case, CirTran allowed the Default Judgment to be 10 entered against it in the adversary proceeding without opposition. 11 That Default Judgment became final when no appeal was taken. 12 Moreover, CirTran then asked the bankruptcy court for relief under 13 Civil Rule 60(b), arguing that it did not receive notice of the 14 request for entry of the Default Judgment and that it had 15 meritorious defenses to ABS’s claims.5 The bankruptcy court 16 reje…
discussed
Cited "see"
State Treasurer v. Abbott
(2×)
See, generally, Shinehouse v. Guerin, 20 E B C 1302 (E.D.Pa, 1996), aff'd 107 F.3d 8 (C.A.3, 1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Chau A/K/A Tam Minn Chau Thomas Chau
See United States v. Banks, No. 96-1422, 107 F.3d 8 (3d Cir. January 7, 1997) (affirming enhancement) and United States v. Burrell, No. 96-1419, 101 F.3d 692 (3d Cir. October 23, 1996) (reversing enhancement).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Casini v. Graustein (In Re Casini)
See also The Reading Co. v. Philadelphia, 155 B.R. 890 (E.D.Pa.1993) aff'd 107 F.3d 8 (3d Cir.1997)(citing Radio-Keith-Orpheum, 13 and noting that one who contracts with a debtor prior to bankruptcy cannot avoid the consequences of bankruptcy because he bargains for a legal relationship).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local 27 Annuity, Health & Welfare Fund, Richard Bonner, Kenneth Laursen, Charles Wiggs, Paul A. Amatuzio, Jr., Charles Roselli, Brian E. Kiker, Robert N. Stoner, Edward S. Burke, Raymond Dinetta, Brian Kamp, Trustees and Fiduciaries for Local 27
v.
Shore Sheet Metal, Inc., Charles Nelson, Ltm, Inc
v.
Shore Sheet Metal, Inc., Charles Nelson, Ltm, Inc
95-5827.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jan 30, 1997.
Published
Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local 27
Annuity, Health & Welfare Fund, Richard Bonner, Kenneth
Laursen, Charles Wiggs, Paul A. Amatuzio, Jr., Charles
Roselli, Brian E. Kiker, Robert N. Stoner, Edward S. Burke,
Raymond Dinetta, Brian Kamp, Trustees and Fiduciaries for Local 27
v.
Shore Sheet Metal, Inc., Charles Nelson, LTM, Inc.
NO. 95-5827
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Jan 30, 1997
Appeal From: D.N.J. , No. 92-05258 ,
Brown, J.
1
Affirmed.