green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
22.9 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2011 ·
... the market rate should be applied in chapter 11 eases where there exists an efficient market. but where no efficient market exists for a chapter 11 debtor, then the bankruptcy court should employ the formula approach endorsed by the till plurality.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
William Ochadleus v. City of Detroit
(2×)
courts have rarely analyzed the source of their authority to refuse to hear an appeal on equitable mootness grounds.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re SW Boston Hotel Venture, LLC
(3×)
... the market rate should be applied in chapter 11 eases where there exists an efficient market. but where no efficient market exists for a chapter 11 debtor, then the bankruptcy court should employ the formula approach endorsed by the till plurality.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: Tony Perkins
HomePatient, Inc.), 420 F.3d 559, 565 (6th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 942 , 127 S. Ct. 55, 166 (2006); In re White, 41 B.R. 227, 230 (Bankr.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: Tony Perkins
HomePatient, Inc.), 420 F.3d 559, 565 (6th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 942 , 127 S. Ct. 55, 166 (2006); In re White, 41 B.R. 227, 230 (Bankr.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Tci 2 Holdings, LLC
(3×)
See also In re American HomePatient, Inc., 420 F.3d 559, 568 (6th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 942 , 127 S.Ct. 55 , 166 L.Ed.2d 251 (2006) (Footnote 14 in the Till opinion “means that the market rate should be applied in Chapter 11 eases where there exists an efficient market.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NEXBANK, SSB
v.
AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC.
v.
AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC.
No. 05-1398.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Oct 2, 2006.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 14 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (3) · Sixth Circuit (2)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.