In re Seaman, 286 A.2d 509 (N.J. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Seaman, 286 A.2d 509 (N.J. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH J. SEAMAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 24, 1972.
286 A.2d 509
Mr. Martin A. Spritzer appeared on behalf of the Middle-sex County Ethics Committee, for the order., Mr. Walter D. Van Riper appeared for the respondent.
Cuelam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Pee Cuelam.

Bespondent stands convicted of misconduct in office, extortion and conspiracy to commit each of these crimes. He has been sentenced to State Prison for a term of 1-3 years and fined $5,000. The precise nature of the criminal activity is set forth in full detail in 114 N. J. Super. 19 (App. Div. 1971).

The circumstances of the case permit of no appropriate discipline short of disbarment.

The order of the Court is that the name of the respondent be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

For disbarment: Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Mountain—7.

Opposed: None.