Ranges v. Ranges, 359 A.2d 487 (N.J. 1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Ranges v. Ranges, 359 A.2d 487 (N.J. 1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Price v. Martinetti
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dimitrov v. Carlson, 138 N.J.Super. 52, 56 , 350 A.2d 246 (App.Div.1975) (holding that “a use variance does not expire and is not lost simply by reason of the passage of time and non-exercise, absent an express time limitation set forth in the variance itself or in the zoning ordinance”), certif. denied, 70 N.J. 275 , 359 A.2d 487 (1976); see also 3 Rathkopfs The Law of Zoning and Planning § 58:24 (Ziegler rev. 2011) (stating that “[t]he whole purpose of a variance is to enable a landowner to make reasonable use of his property, a right that should not be lost through failure to exe…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HAROLD C. RANGES, III
v.
HAROLD C. RANGES
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Apr 1, 1976.
359 A.2d 487
Published

Petition for certification denied.