green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Elvis David Lewis v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Lettman v. Reno, 185 F.3d 1216 (11th Cir.1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
TRUONG
(2×)
See Lettman v. Reno, 185 F.3d 1216 (11th Cir. 1999), vacating in part Lettman v. Reno, 168 F.3d 463 (11th Cir. 1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert A. Lettman v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Immigration and Naturalization Service
See, e.g., Lettman v. Reno, 168 F.3d 463 (11th Cir.1999) (‘‘Lettman I ”), reh’g granted, opinion vacated in part by Lettman v. Reno, 185 F.3d 1216 (11th Cir.1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lettman v. Reno
See, e.g., Lettman v. Reno, 168 F.3d 463 (11th Cir. 1999) (“Lettman I”), reh’g granted, opinion vacated in part by Lettman v. Reno, 185 F.3d 1216 (11th Cir. 1999). 1 This Court ordered that Lettman’s two appeals be consolidated.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lettman v. Reno
See, e.g., Lettman v. Reno, 168 F.3d 463 (11th Cir.1999) ("Lettman I "), reh'g granted, opinion vacated in part by Lettman v. Reno, 185 F.3d 1216 (11th Cir.1999). * Honorable Alfred T.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carmen REOGAS, Wanda Gibson, Karen Howard, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Jimmy GRAY, Monarch Tile, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
v.
Jimmy GRAY, Monarch Tile, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
96-6767.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Aug 26, 1999.
J. Wilson Mitchell, Yates, Mitchell, Ber-nauer, Winborn & Morton, Florence, AL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., Allan G. King, Littler, Mendelson, Fas-tiff, Tichy & Mathiason, Dallas, TX, for Defendants-Appellees., Lindsey Musselman Davis, Holt, McKenzie, Holt & Musselman, Florence, Al, for Gray.
Dubina, Hill, Gibson.
Published
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.
Before DUBINA, Circuit Judge, and HILL and GIBSON * , Senior Circuit Judges. [*1217] PER CURIAM:The judgment of this court, an unpublished affirmance dated January 6, 1998, having been vacated by the Supreme Court, Reogas v. Gray, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2363, - L.Ed.2d - (1999), and the premises considered,
IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to that court for further consideration in light of Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775, 118 S.Ct. 2275, 141 L.Ed.2d 662 (1998) and 11 U.S.C. Section 362.