Fromowitz v. Fromowitz, 721 A.2d 40 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Fromowitz v. Fromowitz, 721 A.2d 40 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NORA FROMOWITZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT
v.
WILLIAM FROMOWITZ
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division.
Dec 22, 1998.
721 A.2d 40
Afflitto, Raimondi & Afflitto, attorneys for appellant (Thomas R. Raimondi, on the brief)., Edward A. Berger, attorney for respondent.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from that portion of a judgment of divorce that addresses equitable distribution and imputed income to plaintiff for alimony purposes. The judgment, however, expressly reserved determination as to the amount of alimony and counsel fees, rendering the judgment interlocutory.

“[Defendant] has no right to appeal the adverse portions of the incomplete judgment without leave of this court.” Frantzen v. Howard, 132 N.J.Super. 226, 227, 333 A.2d 289 (App.Div.1975); R. 2:2-4. We therefore dismiss this appeal from an order incorrectly represented to this court by both counsel as disposing of all issues as to all parties.

Dismissed.