In re Yannon, 76 A.3d 529 (N.J. 2013). · Go Syfert
In re Yannon, 76 A.3d 529 (N.J. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) James R. Jarrell v. Richard A. Kaul, M.D. (072363)
N.J. · 2015 · confidence medium
Jarrell v. Kaul, 216 N.J. 9 366 (2013).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER L. YANNON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 039712002)
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 16, 2013.
76 A.3d 529
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-376, concluding that CHRISTOPHER L. YANNON of SEA GIRT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2002, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year for violating RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations), RPC 8.1(a) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact in connection with a disciplinary matter), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, deceit, fraud, or misrepresentation); and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHRISTOPHER L. YANNON is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until the further Order of the Court, effective November 15, 2013; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule l:20-20(c), respondent’s failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule l:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent’s petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[*10] ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.