Robert Eugene Lamb v. Turbine Designs, Inc., 207 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 2000). · Go Syfert
Robert Eugene Lamb v. Turbine Designs, Inc., 207 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) Lamb v. Turbine Designs, Inc. (4×)
Ga. · 2000 · confidence medium
OCGA § 10-1-761 (2). 3 In this regard, Georgia’s long-arm statute, OCGA § 9-10-91, provides, in relevant part, as follows: A court of this state may exercise personal jurisdiction over any nonresident . . . as to a cause of action arising from any of the acts, omissions, ownership, use, or possession enumerated in this Code section, in the same manner as if he were a resident of the state, if in person or through an agent, he: (2) Commits a tortious act or omission within this state, except as to a cause of action for defamation of character arising from the act. 4 Lamb, 207 F3d at 1261-12…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Meier Ex Rel. Meier v. Sun International Hotels, Ltd.
11th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Morris, 843 F.2d at 492 ; see also Lamb v. Turbine Designs, Inc., 207 F.3d 1259 , 1261 (11th Cir.2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert Eugene Lamb
v.
Turbine Designs, Inc.
99-10565.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Mar 28, 2000.
207 F.3d 1259
Published
Robert Eugene LAMB, individually, James Morris Lofton, individually, Robert C. Lee, individually, William Gordon Bailey, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

TURBINE DESIGNS, INC., a Florida corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-10565.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Feb. 5, 2001.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. (No. 99-00024-1-CV- WBH), Willis B. Hunt, Jr., Judge.

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges.

HILL, Circuit Judge: Robert Eugene Lamb, James Morris Lofton, Robert C. Lee, and William Gordon Bailey, non-residents of Georgia, brought this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of

Georgia claiming that Turbine Design, Inc., also a non-resident of Georgia, violated the Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act and the Georgia Trade Secrets Act, as well as a variety of other state statutory and common

law duties, by misappropriating proprietary flight and engineering data and then improperly disclosing this information in an application filed with the Federal Aviation Administration in Atlanta, Georgia. The district court held that it had no jurisdiction over Turbine Design, Inc. and dismissed the case. Plaintiffs brought this

appeal. After review, we concluded that this diversity case presented the following question of law: in Georgia, is a nonresident subject to personal jurisdiction under the Georgia long-arm statute when he improperly discloses another nonresident's trade secret to a federal agency at its Georgia office? As there was no controlling Georgia authority, we certified this issue to the Georgia Supreme Court.

On January 9, 2001, the Georgia Supreme Court answered this question in the negative. In a well-reasoned opinion, the court adopted the "government contacts" exception to the exercise of personal jurisdiction under Georgia's long-arm statute and held that where a nonresident's sole contact with Georgia

is with a governmental entity located within Georgia, that contact is insufficient to justify the exercise of personal jurisdiction by a Georgia court over that nonresident. Since the sole contact of the defendants in this case with Georgia was the petitioning of the Federal Aviation Administration in Atlanta, we conclude that the Georgia district court correctly held that it did not have personal jurisdiction over these defendants.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.