United States v. Man Chu Yi, 125 F.3d 860 (9th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Man Chu Yi, 125 F.3d 860 (9th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Sullivan (flsd, 1998-11-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Sullivan
S.D. Fla. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Ramirez-Morales, 125 F.3d 860 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 2308 , 141 L.Ed.2d 166 (1998); United States v. Mizell, 97 F.3d 1453 (6th *1372 Cir.1996); United States v. Wilson, 1998 WL 717289 (10th Cir.1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Man Chu Yi
96-10322.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Sep 24, 1997.
125 F.3d 860
Unpublished

125 F.3d 860

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Man Chu YI, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-10322.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 22, 1997.[*]
Decided Sept. 24, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Guam, No. CR-95-00176-JSU. John S. Unpingco, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: HALL, BRUNETTI, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM[**]

2

Man Chu Yi appeals his conviction following a jury trial and his sentence for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) (reentry of a deported alien convicted of a felony). Yi's counsel has submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which this court construed as a motion to withdraw as counsel. Because our independent review of the record discloses no meritorious issues for review, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is

3

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3