green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Union of Flight Attendants, Local No. 1 v. Air Micronesia, Inc.
when disposition of a federal question requires reference to state law, federal courts are not bound by the forum state's choice of law rules, but are free to apply the law considered relevant to the pending controversy.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoffman v. Schweig (In Re Schweig)
The crucial question of “whether such obligations are in fact for ‘support’ and therefore not dischargeable in bankruptcy, is a question of fact to be decided by the Bankruptcy Court as trier of fact in light of all the facts and circumstances relevant to the intention of the parties.” In re Williams, 703 F.2d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir.1983); accord, In re Yeates, 807 F.2d 874, 878 (10th Cir.1986) (“This determination must be made looking at the substance of the agreement ‘viewed in the crucible of the surrounding circumstances’ ”) (quoting Matter of Crist, 632 F.2d 1226, 1229 (5th C…
cited
Cited "see"
Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.
See Harpring v. Continental Oil Co., 628 F.2d 406, 408-09 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 100 , 70 L.Ed.2d 90 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kneisley v. Hercules Inc.
See Harpring v. Continental Oil Co., 628 F.2d 406, 409 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 100 , 70 L.Ed.2d 90 (1981); Schulz v. Hickok Manufacturing Co., 358 F.Supp. 1208, 1212 (N.D.Ga.1973); cf Moorhouse v. Boeing Co., 501 F.Supp. 390 , 394 n. 6 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd mem., 639 F.2d 774 (3d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Laurence John Layton
See United States v. Palumbo, 639 F.2d 123, 129-30 (3d Cir.1981) (Adams, J., concurring) (reviewing legislative history), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 100 , 70 L.Ed.2d 90 (1981); Comment, Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3) and Inculpatory Statements Against Penal Interest, 66 Calif.L.Rev. 1189, 1191-98 (1978); Fed.R.Evid. 804(b)(4) advisory committee note (1971 Draft), reprinted in 51 F.R.D. 315 , 438-39, 443-44 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Shields v. Grocers Supply Co.
See Harpring v. Continental Oil Co., 628 F.2d 406, 408 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 100 , 70 L.Ed.2d 90 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Michael Savoie, Cross-Appellant v. Otto Candies, Inc., Cross-Appellee
See Harpring v. Continental Oil Co., 628 F.2d 406, 409-10 (5th Cir. *371 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 100 , 70 L.Ed.2d 90 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
See Harpring v. Continental Oil Co., 628 F.2d 406, 409 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 100 , 70 L.Ed.2d 90 (1981); Welch v. University of Texas, 659 F.2d 531 , 534 (5th Cir. 1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Matusky
(2×)
See also United States v. Palumbo, 639 F.2d 123 , 133 & n. 11 (3d Cir.1981) (Adams, J., concurring), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 100 , 70 L.Ed.2d 90 (1981); McCormick on Evidence § 280, at 827 (E.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Julius C. Bomar
See, e.g., In re Crist, 632 F.2d 1226 , 1228 (5th Cir.1980) (in divorce context, describing transfer of “certain personal effects, including ... an automobile”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 100 , 70 L.Ed.2d 90 (1981); Smoot v. State Farm Mut.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Boyd
See, e.g., United States v. Palumbo, 639 F.2d 123, 127-28 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S. Ct. 100 , 70 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bryant
Compare, e.g., United States v. Russell, 712 F. 2d 1256, 1258 (8th Cir.1983), and United States v. Thompson, 708 F. 2d 1294 (8th Cir.1983) (where witness admitted making the prior statement), both upholding admissibility, with United States v. Palumbo, 639 F. 2d 123 , 128 n. 6 (3rd Cir.), cert. den. 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 100 , 70 L.Ed. 2d 90 (1981), and United States v. Orrico, 599 F. 2d 113 (6th Cir.1979), both denying admissibility. [2] Their treatment in the course of the robbery has impact upon sentencing.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gibbs, Stephen A/K/A \Jake
(2×)
See also United States v. Palumbo, 639 F.2d 123, 131 (3d Cir.) (Adams, J., concurring), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 100 , 70 L.Ed.2d 90 (1981); United States v. Puco, 476 F.2d 1099, 1102 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 844 , 94 S.Ct. 106 , 38 L.Ed.2d 82 (1973). 75 In Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 65-66 , 100 S.Ct. 2531, 2538-39 , 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980), the Supreme Court identified two restrictions that the confrontation clause places on the use of hearsay evidence in criminal trials.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Van Hatten v. State
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Palumbo, 639 F.2d 123 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 100 , 70 L.Ed.2d 90 (1981); and State v. Lomax, 227 Kan. 651 , 608 P.2d 959, 966 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jane S. CRIST
v.
James F. CRIST, Jr.
v.
James F. CRIST, Jr.
No. 80-1744.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
102 S. Ct. 100
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Denied.
Justice O’CONNOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.