Kearing v. Teel, 111 S. Ct. 1582 (1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Kearing v. Teel, 111 S. Ct. 1582 (1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “If there is no dispute over the meaning of a contract, there is nothing for [the arbitrators] to do”
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen (vawd, 1998-05-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
W.D. Va. · 1998 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
if there is no dispute over the meaning of a contract, there is nothing for to do
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gary McKNIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant
7th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Johnson v. Director, 911 F.2d 247 (9th Cir.1990) (worker’s compensation), cert. denied sub nom., Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp. v. Director, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 1582 , 113 L.Ed.2d 646 (1991); Gorniak v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., 889 F.2d 481 (3d Cir.1989) (FELA suit by railroad employee).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shirley M. KEARING
v.
S. Martin TEEL, Jr., Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia
No. 90-1217.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 1991.
111 S. Ct. 1582
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: W.D. Virginia (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Denied.