discussed Cited "see, e.g." Weber v. Village of Hanover Park Of course, the touchstone of Robert’s claim is the absence of probable cause for his arrest, for it is well established that “the existence of probable cause for an arrest totally precludes any section 1983 claim for unlawful arrest, false imprisonment, or malicious prosecution_” Mark v. Furay, 769 F.2d 1266, 1269 (7th Cir.1985) (collecting cases); see also Currier v. Baldridge, 914 F.2d 993, 996 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1588 , 113 L.Ed.2d 652 (1991).