green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.8 score
“the court may abstain upon request of a party or sua sponte.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Finkley
the court may abstain upon request of a party or sua sponte.
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomason v. Chestatee Community Ass'n (In re Thomason)
See generally Carver v. Carver, 954 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 986 , 113 S.Ct. 496 , 121 L.Ed.2d 434 (1992) (referring to former Section 362(h)); see also Jove Eng’g, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service, 92 F.3d 1539, 1555 (11th Cir.1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ciccimaro v. Emore (In Re Ciccimaro)
See generally Carver v. Carver, 954 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 986 , 113 S.Ct. 496 , 121 L.Ed.2d 434 (1992); In re Greene, 1999 WL 138905 , at *8 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 1999 WL 689711 (E.D.
cited
Cited "see"
Lord v. Carragher (In Re Lord)
See id.” Carver v. Carver, 954 F.2d 1573, 1578 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 986 , 113 S.Ct. 496 , 121 L.Ed.2d 434 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Maloney
See Carver v. Carver, 954 F.2d 1573, 1576 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 986 , 113 S.Ct. 496 , 121 L.Ed.2d 434 (1992); In re Rook, 102 B.R. 490, 492 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1989), aff' d, 929 F.2d 694 (4th Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jove Engineering, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service
Statutory Contempt Powers — Distinct from the court’s inherent powers are statutory contempt powers that § 105(a) grants in the bankruptcy context, stating, “The court may issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this title.” 11 U.S.C. § 105 (a); see Carver v. Carver, 954 F.2d 1573, 1578 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 986 , 113 S.Ct. 496 , 121 L.Ed.2d 434 (1992); Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Hall, 685 F.2d 1306, 1308-09 (11th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rollins v. Campbell (In Re Rollins)
See Carver v. Carver, 954 F.2d 1573, 1579 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 986 , 113 S.Ct. 496 , 121 L.Ed.2d 434 (1992). 13 Thus, Defendants assert their actions against Debtor, through the filing of the second revocation petition, were excepted from the automatic stay in accordance with Section 362(b)(1) *436 and/or (b)(2). 14 Based on the following discussion, however, this Court concludes that neither exception is applicable herein. 15 Taking the latter provision first, Section 362(b)(2), the Court finds that Defendants’ efforts were directed against the Debt- or personally and specifi…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Moog
See Carver v. Carver, 954 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, Carver v. Carver, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 496 , 121 L.Ed.2d 434 (1992); In re Boyd, 31 B.R. 591 (D.Minn.1983); Matter of Baker, 75 B.R. 120 (Bankr.D.Del.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
James v. Moore (In Re James)
See Carver v. Carver, 954 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 496 , 121 L.Ed.2d 434 (1992). 3 . 11 U.S.C.A. § 1328 (a)(2) (West Supp.1992). 4 . 11 U.S.C.A. § 523 (a)(5)(B) (West 1979 & Supp. 1992). 5 . 754 F.2d 902 (11th Cir.1985). 6 . 11 U.S.C.A. § 362 (h) (West Supp.1992). 7 . 11 U.S.C.A. § 1322 (b) (West 1979 & Supp. 1992). 8 . 11 U.S.C.A. § 362 (e) (West Supp.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re MacK
See, e.g., Carver v. Carver, 954 F.2d 1573, 1578 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 986 , 113 S.Ct. 496 , 121 L.Ed.2d 434 (1992) (holding courts should liberally grant relief where debtor fails to make alimony, maintenance or support payments “to avoid entangling the federal court in family law matters”); In re Dixie Broad., Inc., 871 F.2d 1023 , 1026 (11th Cir.1989), (holding a petition filed in bad faith justifies lifting the stay); In re Robbins, 964 F.2d 342, 346 (4th Cir.1992) (concluding cause exists where lifting the stay will promote judicial economy); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cassidy v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corp.
See also Carver v. Carver, 954 F.2d 1573, 1579 (11th Cir.) (“The court may abstain upon the request *1264 of a party or sua sponte. ‘The abstention provisions ... demonstrate the intent of Congress that concerns of comity and judicial convenience should be met, not by rigid limitations on the jurisdiction of federal courts, but by the discretionary exercise of abstention when appropriate in a particular case’ ”) (quoting In re Wood, 825 F.2d 90 , 93 (5th Cir.1987)), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 986 , 113 S.Ct. 496 , 121 L.Ed.2d 434 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Sokoloff
See, e.g., Carver v. Carver, 954 F.2d 1573, 1578 (11th Cir.) cert. denied, 506 U.S. 986 , 113 S.Ct. 496 , 121 L.Ed.2d 434 (1992); In re White, 851 F.2d 170, 173-74 (6th Cir.1988); In re Mac Donald, 755 F.2d 715, 717 (9th Cir.1985); In re Pacana, 125 B.R. 19, 25 (Bankr. 9th Cir.1991); and In re Simpson, 140 B.R. 857, 860 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edward CARVER
v.
Paulette CARVER
v.
Paulette CARVER
No. 92-5384.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 16, 1992.
113 S. Ct. 496
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: N.D. Illinois (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Denied.