Fleshman v. West, 119 S. Ct. 371 (1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Fleshman v. West, 119 S. Ct. 371 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mayers v. Emigrant Bancorp, Inc. (nysd, 2011-04-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Mayers v. Emigrant Bancorp, Inc. (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 2011 · signal: accord · confidence high
The McDonnell Douglas procedure attempts to compensate for this lack of evidence to ensure that the employee has his or her day in court.”); accord, e.g., Resner v. Arc Mills, Inc., No. 97-7981, 152 F.3d 920 (table), 1998 WL 385771 at *1 (2d Cir.) (“[C]laims brought under § 510 are analyzed using the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas.”), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 947 , 119 S.Ct. 371 , 142 L.Ed.2d 307 (1998); Mohamed v. Sanofi-Aventis Pharm., 06 Civ. 1504, 2009 WL 4975260 at * 17 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed Cited "see" House v. Life Insurance Co. of North America
N.D. Ala. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mers v. Marriott Int’l Group Accidental Death & Dismemberment Plan, 144 F.3d 1014 , 1024 (7th Cir.) (determining that policy provisions defining injury in context of accidental death “to mean bodily injury caused by an accident and resulting directly and independently of all other causes” operate to clarify rather than to contradict corresponding section of summary plan description), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 947 , 119 S.Ct. 372 , 142 L.Ed.2d 307 (1998).
cited Cited "see" Seales v. Amoco Corp.
M.D. Ala. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mers v. Marriott Int’l Group Accidental Death & Dismemberment Plan, 144 F.3d 1014 , 1020 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 372 , 142 L.Ed.2d 307 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Labor Relations Board v. Advanced Stretchforming International, Inc.
9th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
“The rule is to the effect that a reviewing court, in dealing with a determination or judgment which an administrative agency alone is authorized to make, must judge the propriety of such action solely by the grounds invoked by the agency.” SEC v. Chenery Corp. (Chenery II), 332 U.S. 194, 196 , 67 S.Ct. 1575 , 91 L.Ed. 1995 (1947) (emphasis added); see also Fleshman v. West, 138 F.3d 1429, 1433 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 947 , 119 S.Ct. 371 , 42 L.Ed.2d 307 (1998) (“[Chenery ] does not prohibit a reviewing court from affirming an agency decision on a ground different from the one…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee (2×)
9th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Mers v. Marriott Int’l Group Accidental Death & Dismemberment Plan, 144 F.3d 1014 , 1020 (7th Cir.) cert. denied,-U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 372 , 142 L.Ed.2d 307 (1998); Doyle v. Paul Revere Life Ins.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard E. FLESHMAN
v.
Togo WEST, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
No. 98-88.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 19, 1998.
119 S. Ct. 371
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.