green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Swift v. Richardson Sports Ltd. Partners
In Swift I, this Court overruled Defendant’s arguments challenging the Commission’s “finding that plaintiff sustained a compensable injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment[,]” Id. at 138, 620 S.E.2d at 536 , its admission of certain evidence, and the Commission’s award of 299 weeks of workers’ compensation benefits.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael SWIFT, Employee
v.
RICHARDSON SPORTS, LTD. d/b/a Carolina Panthers, Employer and Legion Insurance Company (Cameron M. Harris & Company, Adjusting Service), Carriers
v.
RICHARDSON SPORTS, LTD. d/b/a Carolina Panthers, Employer and Legion Insurance Company (Cameron M. Harris & Company, Adjusting Service), Carriers
No. 598P05..
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 29, 2006.
R. James Lore, Raleigh, for Michael Swift., Shannon P. Metcalf, Hatcher B. Kincheloe, Charlotte, for Richardson Sports, et al.
Goodson, Timmons.
Published
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th day of October 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
TIMMONS-GOODSON, J. recused.