State v. Rumph, 667 S.E.2d 274 (N.C. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Rumph, 667 S.E.2d 274 (N.C. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“when a defendant does not object to instructions, the alleged error is subject to review for plain error only.”
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Johnson (ncctapp, 2008-10-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Johnson
N.C. Ct. App. · 2008 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
when a defendant does not object to instructions, the alleged error is subject to review for plain error only.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Ernest David RUMPH.
No. 304P08..
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 26, 2008.
667 S.E.2d 274
Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Counsel, Locke Bell, District Attorney, for State of NC.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th day of June 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."