In re Se. Eye Ctr.-Pending Matters, 809 S.E.2d 582 (N.C. 2018). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Se. Eye Ctr.-Pending Matters, 809 S.E.2d 582 (N.C. 2018). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: In Re Se. Eye Ctr. (Pending Matters) (ncbizct, 2020-08-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re Se. Eye Ctr. (Pending Matters)
N.C. Bus. Ct. · 2020 · confidence medium
Eye Ctr. - Pending Matters, 809 S.E.2d 582, 582 (N.C. 2018), thus determining that the April 28, 2016 Orders were interlocutory and did not “[a]ffect[ ] a substantial right[,] [i]n effect determine[ ] the action and prevent[ ] a judgment from which an appeal might be taken[,] [d]iscontinue[ ] the action[, or] [g]rant[ ] or refuse[ ] a new trial[,]” N.C.G.S. § 7A-27(a)(3).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN RE SOUTHEASTERN EYE CENTER-PENDING MATTERS In re Southeastern Eye Center-Judgments
No. 358A16.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 1, 2018.
809 S.E.2d 582
Morgan.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Morgan, J.

Appellants have failed to demonstrate grounds for appellate review under[*583] N.C.G.S. 7A-27(a)(3) (2017). The appeals in this matter are therefore dismissed.