United States v. Woodley, 130 F.3d 444 (11th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Woodley, 130 F.3d 444 (11th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“his court must conclude that a retaliatory discharge claim is cognizable under 1981 as it presently exists”
46 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Smith v. BHS Hospital Services, Inc. (mdd, 2022-06-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Smith v. BHS Hospital Services, Inc.
D. Maryland · 2022 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
his court must conclude that a retaliatory discharge claim is cognizable under 1981 as it presently exists
discussed Cited "see" Resolution Trust Corporation v. Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland
3rd Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at 478-79 (noting that the phrase "in the normal course of employment" serves only to define the type of excluded benefits andfinding that "[t]his phrase does not mean that allegedly dishonestly obtained commissions are included within the policy"). 120 We agree with F&D's argument that the district court erred in finding that the phrase "earned in the normal course of employment" could be construed as precluding the "one-time payments" provided for in the closing agreements.
discussed Cited "see" Resolution Trust Corp. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MD,et al. (Part II)
3rd Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at 478-79 (noting that the phrase “in the normal course of employment” serves only to define the type of excluded benefits and finding that “[t]his phrase does not mean that allegedly dishonestly obtained commissions are included within the policy”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Woodley
96-8809.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Nov 6, 1997.
130 F.3d 444
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 79%
Citer courts: D. Maryland (1)

130 F.3d 444

U.S.
v.
Woodley[*]

NO. 96-8809

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Nov 06, 1997

Appeal From: N.D.Ga. ,No.95004881CR1JTC

1

Affirmed.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3