LaSalle v. State, 198 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 1967). · Go Syfert
Search
LaSalle v. State, 198 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pablo H. LaSALLE
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 35683.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 28, 1967.
198 So. 2d 14
Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for petitioner., Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James T. Carlisle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Caldwell, Connell, Drew, Thomas, Thornal.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this court so we issued the writ. However, after hearing argument of the parties and upon further consideration of the briefs and record we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore the writ of certiorari heretofore issued is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.