Mateau v. Flava Farms, Inc., 207 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1968). · Go Syfert
Mateau v. Flava Farms, Inc., 207 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jorge A. MATEAU
v.
FLAVA FARMS, INC., Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and the Florida Industrial Commission
No. 37016.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Mar 6, 1968.
207 So. 2d 684
Sam D. Phillips, Jr., West Palm Beach, for petitioner., Cone, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, Mc-Keown & Dell, West Palm Beach, Larry Klein, North Palm Beach, Patrick H. Mears Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lake-land, for respondents.
Adams, Drew, Ervin, Nal, Roberts, Thor.
Published
PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 6, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and THOR-NAL, ERVIN and ADAMS. JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents.