green
Positive treatment
0.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American United Life Insurance v. American United Insurance
American Auto., 618 F.Supp. at 797 (rejecting defendant insurance company’s claim that licensing is a defense to Lanham Act claims and citing Children’s Bootery, 107 So. at 349 ); see also Shatterproof Glass Corp. v. Buckmaster, 256 So.2d 531, 533 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 264 So.2d 427 (Fla.1972). *488 In addition, the Florida Supreme Court’s holding is reiterated in the Florida Administrative Code: IN-1.002 Name Assignments.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SHATTERPROOF GLASS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
v.
R. P. BUCKMASTER and National Glass Company, a Florida corporation
v.
R. P. BUCKMASTER and National Glass Company, a Florida corporation
No. 42059.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 30, 1972.
Adkins, Boyd, Carlton, Dekle, McCain.
Published
Certiorari denied. 256 So.2d 531.
CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur. DEKLE, J., dissents.