U.S v. Henthorn, 68 F.3d 465 (5th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
U.S v. Henthorn, 68 F.3d 465 (5th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“watson's allegations that hattox influenced prospective witnesses and suborned perjury do not destroy the prosecutor's absolute immunity.”
57 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Poullard v. Guillory (lawd, 2025-09-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Poullard v. Guillory
W.D. La. · 2025 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
his appeal lacks arguable merit and is therefore frivolous
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Davis v. Stone
W.D. La. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
watson's allegations that hattox influenced prospective witnesses and suborned perjury do not destroy the prosecutor's absolute immunity.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Dondero v. Jernigan
N.D. Tex. · 2022 · confidence medium
Willis, 263 F.3d at 163 (citing Nobby Lobby, 970 F.2d at 85-86 & n.3); Henthorn, 68 F.3d at 465; Chitimacha Tribe of La., 690 F.2d at 1164 n.3; In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litig., 614 F.2d at 960 ; In re Dorsey, 489 F. App’x at 764 ; Martin, 2021 WL 4784756 , at *1; In re Gordon, 2019 WL 11816606 , at *1.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Romero-Galindez
1st Cir. · 2015 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Munoz, 68 F.3d 465 , 1995 WL 581435, *1 (5th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (unpublished) (“The court’s understatement of the supervised release term by two years was a relatively small fraction of the maximum term of imprisonment (life) that [the defendants] faced.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
U.S
v.
Henthorn
94-60609.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 25, 1995.
68 F.3d 465

68 F.3d 465

U.S.
v.
Henthorn[**]

NO. 94-60609

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Aug 23, 1995

Appeal From: S.D.Tex., No. 1-CR-85-278-1

1

DISMISSED.

**

Conference Calendar