green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
RC EX REL. ALA. DISABILITIES ADVOCACY v. Walley
See R.C. v. Nachman, 969 F.Supp. 682, 686 (M.D.Ala.1997), aff'd, 145 F.3d 363 (11th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited "see"
R.C. ex rel. Alabama Disabilities Advocacy, Program v. Walley
See R.C. v. Nachman, 969 F.Supp. 682, 686 (M.D.Ala.1997), aff'd, 145 F.3d 363 (11th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Db v. Madison County Dhr
See generally R.C. v. Nachman, 969 F.Supp. 682 (M.D.Ala.1997), affirmed, 145 F.3d 363 (11th Cir.1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gary Edwin Bennett v. Trevecca Nazarene University
See, e.g., Simpson v. Sto Corp., 951 F.Supp. 202, 206 (M.D.Ala.1996), aff’d, 145 F.3d 363 (11th Cir.1998); Thomas v. Halstead, 605 So.2d 1181 , 1184 (Ala.1992); Hooper v. Barnett Bank of West Fla., 474 So.2d 1253, 1257 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1985); V.S.H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peters v. Amoco Oil Co.
See, e.g., Simpson v. Sto Corp., 951 F.Supp. 202, 206 (M.D.Ala.1996), aff'd, 145 F.3d 363 (11th Cir.1998); Thomas v. Halstead, 605 So.2d 1181, 1184 (Ala.1992); Hooper v. Barnett Bank of West Fla., 474 So.2d 1253, 1257 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1986); V.S.H.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Aldridge
v.
Lily-Tulip, Inc.
v.
Lily-Tulip, Inc.
97-8344.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
May 21, 1998.
Published
Aldridge
v.
Lily-Tulip, Inc.[**]
NO. 97-8344
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
May 21, 1998
1
Appeal From: S.D.Ga. ,No.87-00084-CV-1-DHB ; Appealing after remand 40 F.3d 1202
2
Affirmed.
**
Local Rule 36 case