No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James H. HALL and H. E. Garrett
v.
Jack ROSS and LSL Corporation
v.
Jack ROSS and LSL Corporation
No. 75-1124.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jul 21, 1976.
Harry M. Hobbs, Tampa, for appellants., Charles F. Clark and! Thomas B. Mimms, Jr., of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellee Jack Ross., Thomas C. MacDonald, Jr., and Donald A. Gifford, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stal-lings & Evans, Tampa, for appellee LSL Corp.
Grimes, Hobson, Man.
Published
PER CURIAM.
After careful consideration of the voluminous trial record, the briefs, the order appealed, and the oral arguments of counsel, it is our judgment that the directed verdict rendered by the trial court in favor of the appellees/defendants, entered at the conclusion of the appellants’/plaintiffs’ case, is
AFFIRMED.
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.