Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage Dist. v. United States, 147 F.3d 1168 (9th Cir. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage Dist. v. United States, 147 F.3d 1168 (9th Cir. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Central Arizona Water Conservation District v. United States (azd, 1998-11-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Central Arizona Water Conservation District v. United States
D. Ariz. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation and Drainage District v. United States, 147 F.3d 1168 , 1171 n. 3 (9th Cir.1998). 5 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation and Drainage District, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Arizona Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Arizona and New Magma Irrigation & Drainage District, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Arizona
v.
United States
97-16432.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jul 7, 1998.
147 F.3d 1168
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

147 F.3d 1168w

28 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,467, 98 Cal. Daily Op.
Serv. 5334,
98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,785,
98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7484

MARICOPA-STANFIELD IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Arizona; Central
Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District, a Municipal
Corporation of the State of Arizona; and New Magma
Irrigation & Drainage District, a Municipal Corporation of
the State of Arizona, Plaintiffs/Appellees,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 97-16432.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 12, 1998.
Decided July 7, 1998.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION