discussed Cited as authority (rule) Hutchins v. State This court, in Horzempa v. State, 397 So.2d 270, 274 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 397 So.2d 276 (Ala.1981) held: “[A]s to a warrant for the search of premises, it is better, as a general rule, that the search warrant contain the name [or, as permitted by § 15-5-3, a description] of the owner or occupier of the premises to be searched, but that there is no constitutional requirement that it do so.