Heintzelman's Truck Ctr., Inc. v. Gibson, 409 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). · Go Syfert
Heintzelman's Truck Ctr., Inc. v. Gibson, 409 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Ciamar Marcy, Inc. v. Monteiro Da Costa (fladistctapp, 1987-06-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ciamar Marcy, Inc. v. Monteiro Da Costa
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Heintzelman's Truck Center, Inc. v. Gibson, 409 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 5th DCA), pet. for review denied, 419 So.2d 1197 , 1198 (Fla. 1982); Doral Country Club, Inc. v. Lindgren Plumbing Co., 175 So.2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 179 So.2d 212 (Fla. 1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HEINTZELMAN'S TRUCK CENTER, INC., and Ken Kaatz
v.
D. Leroy GIBSON
No. 80-86.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct 21, 1981.
409 So. 2d 1060
R. L. Russell, of Van Den Berg, Gay & Burke, P.A., Orlando, for appellants., Daniel J. Roberson, of Roberson & Roberson, Deland, for appellee.
Church, Frank, Orfinger, Sharp.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
SHARP, Judge.

Heintzelman’s Truck Center, Inc. (Heint-zelman’s) and Kaatz appeal from a final judgment awarding damages to appellee, Gibson. Gibson sued appellants for the conversion of a truck he purchased from Heint-zelman’s. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of Gibson on the issue of liability and awarded Gibson compensatory damages against Heintzelman’s and Kaatz (jointly and severally) of nineteen thousand one hundred eighty-one dollars fifty cents ($19,-181.50). The jury awarded Gibson nineteen thousand dollars ($19,000) in punitive damages against Heintzelman’s.

After a careful review of the record we find no reversible error occurred with regard to the compensatory damage award. Accordingly, it is affirmed. However, the punitive damage award against Heintzel-man’s is not sustainable under the dictates of Mercury Motors Express, Inc. v. Smith, 393 So.2d 545 (Fla. 1981). It is therefore reversed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

ORFINGER and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.