Expert Tile, Inc. v. Hammann, 409 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). · Go Syfert
Expert Tile, Inc. v. Hammann, 409 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
EXPERT TILE, INC., a Florida Corporation
v.
Otto HAMMANN and Gisela C. Rotter
No. 81-416.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec 16, 1981.
409 So. 2d 1068
Edward J. Richardson of Saxon & Richardson, Melbourne, for appellant., Calvin B. Brown of Collins, Brown, Caldwell & Evans, Vero Beach, for appellees.
Glickstein, Green, Hurley, Oliver.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error and, consequently, we affirm the trial court’s decision on the merits. However, it was conceded at oral argument that it was error not to award appel-lees/defendants’ attorney’s fees for that portion of the defense which was necessary to defeat the mechanic’s lien claim. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part and the cause is remanded with instructions to award appel-lees an appropriate attorney’s fee.

GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., and GREEN, OLIVER L., Associate Judge, concur.