Cotto v. State, 433 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Cotto v. State, 433 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pedro Delgado COTTO
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 82-2715.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jul 8, 1983.
433 So. 2d 1032
Jerry Hill, Public Defender and John T. Kilcrease, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Bar-tow, for appellant., Pedro Delgado Cotto, pro se., Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Diane Barrs, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Grimes, Han, Lon, Morton, Ryder.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Pedro Delgado Cotto appeals his judgment and sentence for burglary of a dwelling. While we find no substantive merit in this appeal, we note that the lower court erred in imposing court costs against Cotto, who earlier had been adjudged indigent.

Accordingly, we strike the costs of $10 and $2 assessed against appellant under sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes (1981). See Brown v. State, 427 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Except as set forth above, we affirm the judgment and sentence.

GRIMES, A.C.J., RYDER, J., and HAN-LON, MORTON, J., Associate Judge, concur.