Mach Rosenstein & Co. v. Mandel, 444 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Mach Rosenstein & Co. v. Mandel, 444 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MACH ROSENSTEIN & COMPANY
v.
Mark MANDEL, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph Gordon
No. 83-1567.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan 24, 1984.
444 So. 2d 541
Marlow, Shofi, Ortmayer, Smith, Connell & Valerius and Joseph H. Lowe, Miami, for appellant., Lapidus & Stettin and Jeffrey H. Fink, Miami, for appellee.
Baskin, Ferguson, Hendry.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order of the trial court denying its motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person and for improper service of process.

We have carefully considered the record, briefs and argument of counsel and have concluded that the trial court was correct in denying the motion to dismiss. See: Godfrey v. Neumann, 373 So.2d 920 (Fla.1979); Electro Engineering Products Co., Inc. v. Lewis, 352 So.2d 862 (Fla.1977); Engineered Storage Systems, Inc. v. National Partitions & Interiors, Inc., 415 So.2d 114 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Lacy v. Force V Corp., 403 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Laventhol, Krekstein, Horwath & Horwath v. Investors Tax Shel[*542] tered Real Estate, Ltd., 838 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); sections 48.061(1), and 48.193(l)(b, g), Florida Statutes (1981).

Affirmed.