Tweed v. State, 445 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Tweed v. State, 445 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Jimmie Rushing, Jr. v. Sylvia Rushing
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2025 · confidence medium
Co., N.A. v. Higginbotham Chevrolet-Oldsmobile, Inc., 445 So. 2d 347, 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Aecom Technical Services, Inc. v. Professional Service Industries, Inc.
M.D. Fla. · 2021 · confidence medium
Co. v. Higginbotham Chevrolet-Oldsmobile, Inc., 445 So. 2d 347, 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (allowing expert testimony to “show the meaning of technical terms” because such explanation “does not contradict or vary the written instrument, but simply places the court in the position of the parties when they made the contract” and using that expert testimony to find the contract was unambiguous); see also NCP Lake Power, Inc. v. Fla. Power Corp., 781 So. 2d 531, 536 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Hinote v. Brigman, 33 So. 303 , 305 (Fla. 1902).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Apple Glen Investors, L.P. v. Express Scripts, Inc.
11th Cir. · 2017 · confidence medium
Co., N.A. v. Higginbotham Chevrolet-Oldsmobile, Inc., 445 So.2d 347, 348 (Fla. Dist.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In re Standard Jury Instructions—Contract & Business Cases
Fla. · 2013 · confidence medium
Southeast Banks Trust Co., N.A. v. Higginbotham Chevrolet-Oldsmobile, Inc., 445 So.2d 347, 348-49 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). 416.17INTERPRETATION — CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT AS A WHOLE In deciding what the disputed term(s) of the contract mean, you should consider the whole contract, not just isolated parts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James TWEED
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 83-1479.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb 17, 1983.
445 So. 2d 347
Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and L.S. Al-perstein, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant., James Tweed, pro se., Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Gary 0. Welch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Hobson, Ryder, Scheb.
Published
PER CURIAM.

This case comes to us on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant has filed a handwritten letter which we have treated as a supplemental brief. Having reviewed the Anders brief, appellant’s pro se brief and the record on appeal, we find no reversible error with respect to the judgment and sentence. Accordingly, we affirm.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and SCHEB and RYDER, JJ., concur.