City of Clearwater v. Donahue, 450 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
City of Clearwater v. Donahue, 450 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CITY OF CLEARWATER and Hewitt, Coleman & Associates
v.
Bernard DONAHUE
No. AW-85.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 30, 1984.
450 So. 2d 353
Peter H. Dubbeld of Riden, Watson & Goldstein, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellants., Enrique Escarraz, III, and Donald C. Anderson, St. Petersburg, for appellee.
Mills, Shivers, Wigginton.
Published
MILLS, Judge.

We find competent substantial evidence to support the deputy commissioner’s finding of a causal relationship between Donahue’s compensable injuries and his present psychiatric condition. We also find competent substantial ’ evidence to support the finding that Donahue suffered a compensa-ble injury on 4 April 1983. Accordingly, the City of Clearwater’s argument that Section 440.19, Florida Statutes (1983), bars Donahue’s claim for benefits is without merit.

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.