Florida Bar v. Rodriguez, 465 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Florida Bar v. Rodriguez, 465 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
THE FLORIDA BAR
v.
William RODRIGUEZ
No. 66051.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Mar 7, 1985.
465 So. 2d 530
John F. Harkness, Jr. and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and David M. Barnovitz, Bar Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, for complainant., William Rodriguez, in pro. per.
Adkins, Alderman, Ehrlich, McDonald, Overton.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Upon a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment by respondent this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Rodriguez’ alleged misconduct. Rodriguez acknowledged his violation of article XI, Rules 11.02(2), 11.02(3)(a), 11.-02(4) and Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(6), 9-102(A) and 9-102(B)(4). The referee recommended that Rodriguez be found guilty in accordance with his conditional plea and that he be given a public reprimand.

Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.

Judgment for costs in the amount of $1,048.55 is hereby entered against respondent, for which let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.