green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Sharts v. Natelson
See Succession of LaSalle v. Clark, 503 So.2d 694 (La.App.1987) cert. denied, 505 So.2d 1146 (1987); Graham v. Holler, 499 So.2d 62 (Fla.App.1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SUCCESSION OF Mary Savant LaSALLE
v.
Josephine Singleton CLARK and Dianne Savant Brown
v.
Josephine Singleton CLARK and Dianne Savant Brown
No. 87-C-0764.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
May 8, 1987.
Watson.
Published
Lead Opinion
In re Clark, Josephine S.; Brown, Dianne Savant; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 86-290; Parish of Calca-sieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 23-045.
Prior report: La.App., 503 So.2d 694.
Denied. The result is correct.
Concurrence
WATSON, J.,
concurs. The notary cannot be faulted for putting what he was apparently told in the deed. In any event, the words in the deed do not change the legal rights of the parties.