Sanders v. State, 507 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Sanders v. State, 507 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Delrio
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2011 · confidence medium
Pagan, 830 So.2d at 807 ; see also Garcia v. State, 872 So.2d 326, 329-30 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Finfrock v. State, 507 So.2d 1230, 1231 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) (citing Neary v. State, 384 So.2d 881 (Fla.1980)).
cited Cited "see" Sanders v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sanders v. State, 507 So.2d 1230 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
cited Cited "see" Sanders v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sanders v. State, 507 So.2d 1230 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Wallis v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Finfrock v. State, 507 So.2d 1230 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Warren v. State, 475 So.2d 1027 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); and Bundy v. State, 455 So.2d 330 (Fla. 1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael SANDERS
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 86-1539.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jun 4, 1987.
507 So. 2d 1230
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
Cobb, Dauksch, Lockett.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, J., and LOCKETT, J.T., Associate Judge, concur. COBB, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissent

COBB, Judge,

dissenting:

In this case the defendant was tried in shackles without any preliminary determination that such was necessary to deter escape or prevent a disturbance or potential injury to people in the courtroom. See McCoy v. State, 503 So.2d 371 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). Unlike McCoy, this record shows an impairment or detriment to the defendant inasmuch as he, as appointed co-counsel, was unable to freely participate in the trial, particularly in regard to the attendance of bench conferences. It was unnecessary for the trial judge to appoint Sanders as his own co-counsel;[1] having done so, however, the trial judge was not at liberty to shackle him without any justification. I would reverse for a new trial.

1

See Sheppard v. State, 391 So.2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).