Jody E. Allen v. A. G. Thomas, Warden, 172 F.3d 884 (11th Cir. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Jody E. Allen v. A. G. Thomas, Warden, 172 F.3d 884 (11th Cir. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mitchell v. USBI Company (ca11, 1999-09-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Mitchell v. USBI Company
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
cited Cited "see" Mitchell v. USBI Company
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" Allison v. McGhan Medical Corp.
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chem., Inc., 158 F.3d 548 , 565 & n.21 (11th Cir. 1998) (finding an abuse of discretion when the court fails to conduct a suitable inquiry into the relevant factors to determine whether expert testimony should be admitted), reh’g denied, 172 F.3d 884 (11th Cir. 1999). 1.
discussed Cited "see" Allison v. McGhan Medical Corp.
unknown court · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See City of Tuscaloosa v. Horcros Chem., Inc., 158 F.3d 548 , 565 & n. 21 (11th Cir.1998) (finding an abuse of discretion when the court fails to conduct a suitable inquiry into the relevant factors to determine whether expert testimony should be admitted), reh’g denied, 172 F.3d 884 (11th Cir.1999). 1.
cited Cited "see" Odumosu v. Keller
N.D.N.Y. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Alexander v. Hawk, 159 F.3d 1321 (11th Cir.1998) (inmate required to exhaust when seeking monetary and injunctive relief), reh. and reh. en banc denied, 172 F.3d 884 (1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re Flat Glass Antitrust Litigation
W.D. Pa. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
Indeed, “regression and statistical analysis have been admitted in antitrust cases to prove injury and to determine damages.” Id. (finding use of multiple regression analysis reliable under Rule 702); see also City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chems., Inc., 158 F.3d 548 , 566 (11th Cir.1998) (expert’s compilation of data from business records and analysis with simple arithmetic, algebra, and multiple regression analysis is well-established as a reliable methodology), reh’g en banc denied, 172 F.3d 884 (11th Cir.), and cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 309 , 145 L.Ed.2d 42 (1999); Askew v…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jody E. Allen
v.
A. G. Thomas, Warden
96-9050.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Feb 3, 1999.
172 F.3d 884
Published

172 F.3d 884

Jody E. Allen
v.
A. G. Thomas, Warden

NO. 96-9050

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

February 03, 1999

S.D.Ga., 161 F.3d 667

1

DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.