Suncrete Corp. v. Bomanite Corp., 522 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). · Go Syfert
Suncrete Corp. v. Bomanite Corp., 522 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SUNCRETE CORPORATION, etc.
v.
BOMANITE CORPORATION
No. 87-1923.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Apr 14, 1988.
522 So. 2d 1084
Christopher J. Weiss of Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, P.A., Orlando, for appellant., Stacy K. Britton of Wallace F. Stalnaker, Jr., P.A., Casselberry, for appellees.
Cobb, Dauksch, Sharp.
Published
DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of dismissal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(v). The trial court was correct in its determination that the Federal Arbitration Act is applicable and that arbitration should first be conducted. However, the proper procedure in this case is for the case to be stayed pending arbitration completion. 9 U.S.C. § 3 (1980); see Sam Reisfeld & Son Import Co. v. S.A. Eteco, 530 F.2d 679 (5th Cir. 1976); see also Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Melamed, 405 So.2d 790, 793 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

The order of dismissal is reversed for entry of a stay order.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SHARP, C.J., and COBB, J., concur.