State v. Pinder, 524 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). · Go Syfert
State v. Pinder, 524 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The STATE of Florida
v.
Dexter PINDER
No. 87-1970.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 10, 1988.
524 So. 2d 501
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellant., Dexter Pinder, in pro. per.
Baskin, Hendry, Jorgenson.
Published
PER CURIAM.

In response to the state’s appeal from the trial court’s ruling granting suppression of evidence and discharge, counsel for appellee filed a memorandum brief confessing error and a motion for leave to withdraw. Proceeding in the manner outlined in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 19 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), this court permitted appellee thirty days within which to file a statement of points. Appellee has not filed his brief or statement. Accordingly, we hold that the state’s appeal has merit. See United States v. Garcia, 741 F.2d 363 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. Torres, 741 F.2d 1323 (11th Cir.1984). Cf. State v. Suco, 521 So.2d 1100 (Fla.1988) (owner of premises, not casual visitor, has standing to challenge search as violative of fourth amendment rights).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.