Gray v. Dep't of State, Div. of Licensing, 524 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Gray v. Dep't of State, Div. of Licensing, 524 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“in the case of attorney's fees the need therefor is not extinguished by a spouse's death; whereas in the case of alimony for the decedent or other such claim, death obviates the necessity therefor”
1 citation event across 0 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: TOBKIN
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) TOBKIN
unknown court · D. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
in the case of attorney's fees the need therefor is not extinguished by a spouse's death; whereas in the case of alimony for the decedent or other such claim, death obviates the necessity therefor
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bradford Robert GRAY
v.
The DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING
No. 87-2292.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 10, 1988.
524 So. 2d 503
Harold M. Braxton, Miami, for appellant., R. Timothy Jansen, Tallahassee, for ap-pellee.
Hendry, Pearson, Schwartz.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 82%
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. § 493.319(l)(p), Fla.Stat. (1987); Village Saloon v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, 463 So.2d 278 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).