green
Positive treatment
9.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Cobos
Ed. 2d 351 (1987); Mead v. Comm’r of Corr., 282 Conn. 317, 323 , 920 A.2d 301 (2007); Krebs v. State, 534 So. 2d 1236, 1237 (Fla. Dist.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State of Washington v. Ignacio Cobos
Comm'r ojCorr., 282 Conn. 317, 323 , 920 A.2d 301 (2007); Krebs v. State, 534 So.2d 1236, 1237 (Fla. Dist.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ghent v. State
Similarly, in Ellis, the court concluded that the acts committed against two of the victims were not connected in an episodic sense to the act allegedly committed against a third victim where the evidence showed only that the acts “were sex offenses occurring within the same two month period in defendant’s home, the victims knew each other, and the defendant was allegedly guilty.” 534 So.2d at 1236. 1 As appellant’s second issue, he claims that the trial court erroneously admitted out-of-court statements uttered by R.B. in the absence of legally sufficient findings of fact to establish…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Felts v. State
In Krebs v. State, 534 So.2d 1236 88160062 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), the Fifth District Court of Appeal held that the amendment in question did not apply retroactively because "The sentencing guidelines affect substantive rights of a defendant, and cannot be applied ex post facto," citing Miller v. Florida. [8] In Shull , the departure sentence was based upon only one reason, the appellant's habitual offender status, which was subsequently found to be invalid.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. State
Simmons v. State, 484 So.2d 104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); see also Seiler v. State, 534 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Bass v. State, 462 So.2d 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Walton Needham SEILER
v.
STATE of Florida
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 87-1828.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 15, 1988.
Charles R. Holloman of Charles R. Hollo-man, P.A., Ocala, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Paula C. Coffman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
Dauksch, Orfinger, Sharp.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of restitution. Appellant was ordered to pay to Marion County a sum of money which the trial court determined he had stolen from the county. Because we reversed the theft conviction we also reverse the order of restitution. See Seiler v. State, 522 So.2d 113 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
SHARP, C.J., and ORFINGER, J., concur.