green
Positive treatment
0.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Interdiction of Watts
See LSA-C.C.P. art.2001, et seq.; see also Succession of Moses v. Carr, 543 So.2d 77, 79 (La.App. 1 Cir.), writ denied, 547 So.2d 362 (La.1989) (defects must be patent on the face of the record).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE ex rel. Earl K. TRUVIA
v.
Hon. Patrick G. QUINLAN, Judge, Criminal District Court
v.
Hon. Patrick G. QUINLAN, Judge, Criminal District Court
No. 89-KH-1658.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jul 13, 1989.
Published
In re Truvia, Earl K.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 252-514.
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.