United States v. J.W. Moore James Moore, A.K.A. \Buster\" Francis Williams, 181 F.3d 1205 (1999). · Go Syfert
United States v. J.W. Moore James Moore, A.K.A. \Buster\" Francis Williams, 181 F.3d 1205 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a district court has wide discretion to control the cross-examination of witnesses.”
11 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: United States v. Maxwell (ca11, 2009-08-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Maxwell
11th Cir. · 2009 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a district court has wide discretion to control the cross-examination of witnesses.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Sebastian Darone McCoy
11th Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at 1242-43 (declining to decide the issue because the defendants did not raise a viable Brady claim for other reasons). 2 II.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Bradford S. Potts
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Matthews, 168 F.3d 1234, 1245 (11th Cir.1999), as amended, 181 F.3d 1205 (11th Cir.1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
J.W. Moore James Moore, A.K.A. \Buster\" Francis Williams
Jul 8, 1999.
181 F.3d 1205

181 F.3d 1205 (11th Cir. 1999)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
J.W. MOORE; James Moore, a.k.a. "Buster"; Francis Williams, Defendants-Appellants.
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Arlutha W. Smiley, Defendant-Appellant.
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Rosa Mae Smiley Williams, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 94-7047, 94-7051 and 94-7055.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 8, 1999.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama (No. CR-93-310-N); Ira DeMent, Judge.

Before EDMONDSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, and MORAN[*] Senior District Judge.

Prior Report: 168 F.3d 1234

PER CURIAM:

1

The petition(s) for rehearing filed by appellants FRANCIS WILLIAMS, ARLUTHA W. SMILEY, and ROSA MAE WILLIAMS are DENIED.

2

Footnote 2 in the original opinion, however, is stricken altogether and this language is put in its place as the new footnote 2:

3

The evidence is detailed in Section III, addressing appellants' claims about multiple conspiracies, and in Section VI, where appellants' sentencing claims are addressed.

Note:

*

Honorable James B. Moran, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.