Disciplinary Bd. v. Smith, 563 So. 2d 864 (La. 1990). · Go Syfert
Disciplinary Bd. v. Smith, 563 So. 2d 864 (La. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DISCIPLINARY BOARD
v.
James David Kimo SMITH
No. 90-B-1610.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jul 20, 1990.
563 So. 2d 864
Published

In Re; Disciplinary Board, La.St. Bar, Plaintiff(s) Application to Impose Reciprocal Discipline.

ORDER

Premises considered.

IT IS ORDERED that James David Kimo Smith and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel inform this Court, within thirty days of service of the notice required by Rules XIX, Section 21 B, of any claim, predicated upon the grounds set forth in Rule XIX, Section 21 D, that the imposition of identical discipline in Louisiana would be unwarranted and the reasons for that claim.