McMillian v. State, 594 So. 2d 1288 (Ala. 1992). · Go Syfert
McMillian v. State, 594 So. 2d 1288 (Ala. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Giles v. State (alacrimapp, 1992-09-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Giles v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See McMillian v. State , 594 So.2d 1253 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991), remanded, 594 So.2d 1288 (Ala. 1992), on remand, 594 So.2d 1289 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McGowan v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., McMillian v. *986 State, 594 So.2d 1253, 1279 (Ala.Crim.App. 1991) (comments, even if improper under Caldwell, did not injure the defendant because the jury returned a recommendation of life imprisonment without parole), remanded on other grounds, 594 So.2d 1288 (Ala.1992), on return to remand, 616 So.2d 933 (Ala.Crim.App.1993); Hooks v. State, 534 So.2d 329, 358 (Ala.Crim.App.1987) (the comments by the trial court and the prosecutor, argued to be in violation of Caldwell , had no effect on the jury's sentencing recommendation because the jury returned a recommendation of life witho…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ex Parte Walter McMillian. (Re Walter McMillian
v.
State of Alabama).
1910243.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
Jan 13, 1992.
594 So. 2d 1288
Maddox, Shores, Adams, Houston, Steagall, Kennedy, Ingram.
Cited by 41 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

The appellee, State of Alabama, having filed a motion to remand for evidentiary hearing, and the same having been duly submitted and considered by the Court, it is considered that the motion to remand is due to be granted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that this cause is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals for entry of an order remanding this cause to the Circuit Court of Baldwin County, Alabama, for evidentia-ry hearing.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this petition for writ of certiorari be stayed until further orders of this Court.

[*1289] HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, ADAMS, HOUSTON, STEAGALL, KENNEDY and INGRAM, JJ., concur.