Toms v. City of Crystal River, 609 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Toms v. City of Crystal River, 609 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harold J. TOMS, Jr. and Charlotte Cunningham Toms
v.
CITY OF CRYSTAL RIVER, Florida, etc.
No. 92-623.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 4, 1992.
609 So. 2d 153
L.R. Huffstetler, Jr., Spring Hill, for appellants., David L. Wilcox of Haag & Deutschman, P.A., Inverness, for appellee, Crystal River.
Dauksch, Goshorn, Harris.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We reverse because the record affirmatively shows that the appellee City of Crystal River failed to comply with section 49.-10(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1991), which requires a notice of action to be published once during each week for four consecutive weeks to perfect service of process by publication. On remand, the trial court is directed to vacate the default entered by the Clerk of the Circuit Court against the appellants Harold G. Toms, Jr. and Charlotte Cunningham Toms and to address their previously filed motion to dismiss.

[*154] REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

GOSHORN, C.J., and DAUKSCH and HARRIS, JJ., concur.