Carr v. Glass-Tech Corp., 614 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Carr v. Glass-Tech Corp., 614 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wayne CARR
v.
GLASS-TECH CORPORATION
No. 92-1556.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Mar 30, 1993.
614 So. 2d 1227
North & Stein, and Gloria O. North, Boca Raton, for appellant., Roger Besu, Miami, and William James Dietz, Rockledge, for appellee.
Gersten, Hubbart, Nesbitt.
Published

[*1228] ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellee’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our original opinion, and issue the following opinion in its stead.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for relief from a final default judgment. Appellant failed to show the existence of a meritorious defense and a legal excuse for failure to comply with the rules. See Cunningham v. White, 390 So.2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Further, we find that appellant properly received service of process in person under section 48.031, Florida Statutes (1991).

Affirmed.