green
Positive treatment
8.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Evans
NMFS contends the issue is not ripe for judicial review because the mixed-stock exception has not been applied and, as yet, imposes no legally binding regulations. *1159 The two-part test for ripeness requires the court to consider “(1) whether the issues are fit for judicial decision, and (2) whether the parties will suffer hardship if [the court] decline[s] to consider the issues.” City of Auburn v. Qwest Corp., 247 F.3d 966, 976 (9th Cir.2001).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
City of Auburn v. Qwest Corp.
(6×)
At 247 F.3d at 980, section II.C.l, second paragraph: Replace sentence reading: “A number of courts have held that various requirements imposed by local ordinances constitute a prohibition within the meaning of § 253(a).” with “A number of courts have held that certain requirements imposed by local ordinances constitute a prohibition within the meaning of § 253(a).” 2.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Hawthorne
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
City of Auburn v. Qwest Corp., 247 F.3d 966, 980 (9th Cir.2001).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of Berkeley
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(1) (district courts may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction if the claim raises a novel or complex issue of state law); City of Auburn, 247 F.3d at 978-80 (declining review of question whether local telecommunications ordinances violate new Washington laws where issues were matter of first impression and no state court had published an opinion addressing the new law). 5.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Auburn City of Bremerton City of Des Moines City of Federal Way a Municipality City of Lakewood City of Medina City of Olympia City of Puyallup City of Renton City of Seatac City of Tacoma City of Tukwila City of University Place City of Vancouver, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants
v.
Qwest Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
v.
Qwest Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
99-36173.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Apr 24, 2001.
Published
247 F.3d 966 (9th Cir. 2001)
CITY OF AUBURN; CITY OF BREMERTON; CITY OF DES MOINES; CITY OF FEDERAL WAY; A MUNICIPALITY; CITY OF LAKEWOOD; CITY OF MEDINA; CITY OF OLYMPIA; CITY OF PUYALLUP; CITY OF RENTON; CITY OF SEATAC; CITY OF TACOMA; CITY OF TUKWILA; CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE; CITY OF VANCOUVER, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,
v.
QWEST CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 99-36173, 99-36219
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Argued and Submitted February 6, 2001,
Filed April 24, 2001
1
NOTE: SEE AMENDED OPINION AT 260 F.3d 1160.