State v. Conrad, 625 So. 2d 158 (La. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Conrad, 625 So. 2d 158 (La. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Washington (lactapp, 1999-01-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Washington
La. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See for example, State v. Conrad, 620 So.2d 366 (La.App. 5 Cir.1993) fn.1, writ granted in part on other grounds and remanded, 625 So.2d 158 (La.1993). bln his first allegation of error the defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying him a hearing on a motion to suppress evidence.
cited Cited "see" State v. Washington
La. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See for example, State v. Conrad, 620 So.2d 366 (La.App. 5 Cir.1993) fn.1, writ granted in part on other grounds and remanded, 625 So.2d 158 (La.1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Joseph CONRAD
No. 93-K-1717.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 1, 1993.
625 So. 2d 158
Marcus.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Granted in part; denied in part.

The record of sentencing does not demonstrate adequate compliance with La.Code Crim.Proc. art. 894.1, nor does it provide a factual basis for imposition of the present sentence. Therefore, the sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentenc-ing.

Upon resentencing, the district court should comply with La.Code Crim.Proc. art. 894.1, as amended by Act 22 of 1991, which requires consideration of the sentencing guidelines promulgated by the Louisiana Sentencing Commission in determining the appropriate sentence to be imposed.

Granted in part with order.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.