In re State Dist. Court Judge XYZ, 627 So. 2d 641 (La. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
In re State Dist. Court Judge XYZ, 627 So. 2d 641 (La. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re STATE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE XYZ
No. 93-O-2790.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Nov 10, 1993.
627 So. 2d 641
Dennis, Hall, Ortique, Watson.
Published

Lead Opinion

In re District Court Judge XYZ; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs.

Denied.

Concurrence

WATSON, J.,

concurs in the denial but notes his opinion that this is a very close matter and that the Judiciary Commission should exercise care because of its vast power.

Concurrence

HALL, J.,

concurs. The motion to quash subpoena duces tecum should first be filed in the Judiciary Commission. However, the showing made does not warrant quashing the subpoena. Thus, I concur in the denial of the motion to quash, but I would grant the motion to keep the filing confidential in this matter pending before the Commission.

ORTIQUE, J., joins in the concurrence by HALL, J. DENNIS, J., not on panel.